Technical Skill Assessment with AI Recruitment Tools
Blog
7 Min Read
Technical skill assessment is no picnic. The tools and platforms designed to help make technical hiring simpler often come with their own set of headaches: Are these coding challenges actually relevant? Is this fancy software worth the cost? What tech interview questions should I even ask? And let’s not even start on the generative AI resumes making every candidate look like a coding prodigy.
But before you throw in the towel and start technical hiring based on horoscope compatibility, consider a more strategic approach. Enter AI recruitment tools for the initial screening – your new best friend in filtering out the noise and zeroing in on candidates worth a second glance. Combine this with advanced simulations for deeper skill assessment and a final round of human judgement from recruiters and senior techies, and you’ve got a recipe for hiring success.
The State of Tech Hiring Workforce and Hiring Forecast
The 2024 tech hiring scene is more like a rollercoaster than a smooth ride - both for recruiters and candidates. We’re witnessing an evolution in the sources of technical hiring, hiring preferences and trends, and what the future holds for tech recruiters and the tech workforce.
Despite 80% of tech job applications coming from organic sources, nearly half of the hires come from inorganic sources. Referrals, in particular, are 9x more likely to lead to a job than company career site applications. It's like playing the lottery but with way better odds. Mid-level and senior roles are typically filled through prospecting. Junior and entry-level positions are mostly filled through organic sources. IT support, QA, and UI/UX design roles love organic sources. Backend and frontend engineering? Not so much—they prefer prospecting.
The job market remains tight with 10.3 million job openings, slightly lower than the record 11 million in 2021. The main challenge is filling these roles with high-quality candidates. By 2030, there could be a global shortage of 85 million jobs due to skill gaps, leading to $8.5 trillion in unrealized revenues. Digital and data literacy skills are particularly in demand. 72% of tech workers are considering job changes within the next year. Upskilling and reskilling are crucial, with 94% of employees willing to stay longer if offered good learning opportunities. By 2025, half of all employees will need reskilling due to technological advancements. Upskilling is projected to boost global GDP by over $6 trillion and create millions of new jobs by 2030.
There is a shift towards skills-based recruitment, which is seen as more equitable and efficient. Organisations are focusing on creating more agile ways of organising work and evaluating candidates based on skills rather than just job experience - and digital transformation plays a huge role in helping tech recruiters make that happen.
The Tech Hiring Market in 2024: Projections, Impact, and More
Challenges of Technical Skill Assessment and Impact on KPIs
Technical hiring is not easy - especially when it comes to hiring for tech roles. Whether its tech interview questions, AI recruitment tools, or just cost-per-hire, the impact on the office of the HR is significant. Here are some recruitment challenges in tech:
Rapidly Evolving Technologies
Tech skills are like fashion trends – what's hot today could be out tomorrow (or replaced by AI). Keeping up with the latest skills is a full-time job in itself. Recruiters can't always be sure if a candidate's skills are cutting-edge or last year's news. This constant change means recruiters often struggle to accurately assess if candidates are genuinely up-to-date, leading to potential mismatches and costly hires.
Customizing Assessments for Specific Roles
Designing the perfect test for a specific job role is not easy. Every tech role has unique requirements, and creating a one-size-fits-all assessment just doesn’t cut it. Developing tailored assessments for each position is time-consuming and expensive. It’s nearly impossible to cover all the necessary skills without overwhelming the candidate and the technical hiring process.
Lack of Real-World Relevance
Technical skill assessments often fail to replicate real-world scenarios, making it hard to gauge how a candidate will perform on the job. High scores on these tests don’t always translate to high performance in the workplace, leading to hires who can ace a test but flop when it comes to actual job duties.
Assessing Soft Skills Alongside Technical Skills
Can your tech genius hold a conversation? Make for a good cultural fit? Most tools are great at measuring hard skills like coding but fall flat on evaluating soft skills in tech interview questions like communication and teamwork. This gap means companies might end up with brilliant techies who can’t collaborate or communicate effectively, impacting team dynamics and project success.
Scalability of Technical Skill Assessment
It’s impossible to handle assessments of large volumes of candidates, and it is difficult to pour complete faith in RPO without having much control of the recruitment process. Limited scalability means delays in hiring, increased costs, and potential loss of top talent who move on while waiting for the assessment process to catch up.
Bias and Fairness in Assessments
Keeping bias out of assessments is harder than finding a needle in a haystack. Unconscious biases can creep into the design and implementation of assessments - especially tech interview questions, leading to unfair advantages or disadvantages for certain groups. Bias can skew results, negatively impacting diversity and inclusion efforts, and potentially leading to legal issues and reputational damage.
Candidate Experience
Ensuring candidates have a positive experience during assessments is harder than it sounds. Lengthy or overly complex assessments can frustrate candidates, leading to dropout rates. Poor candidate experience can harm the company’s reputation, reduce the talent pool, and ultimately affect the quality of technical hiring.
Consistency in Assessment Standards
Variations in assessment difficulty and criteria can lead to inconsistent results. Inconsistent standards make it difficult to compare candidates fairly, potentially leading to biased or incorrect hiring decisions.
Measuring Potential vs. Current Skill Level
Differentiating between a candidate's current skills and their potential for growth is tough. Standard tech interview questions often focus on existing skills rather than a candidate’s ability to learn and adapt. This focus on current skills can overlook candidates with high potential who could excel with proper training and development, affecting long-term organisational growth.
Keeping Assessments Up-to-Date
Continuously updating assessments to reflect the latest skills and technologies is a never-ending task. The tech landscape evolves rapidly, and assessments can quickly become outdated. Outdated assessments fail to measure relevant skills, leading to hires who are not equipped to meet current job demands, impacting productivity and performance.
Technical Skill Assessment Using AI
AI platforms like HackerRank, Codility, and tools like it have become popular tools for assessing the technical skills of candidates. These platforms assess candidates based on tech challenges that mirror real-world scenarios, offering a structured way to evaluate candidates' problem-solving abilities and technical proficiency.
The limitations:
Standardized tests can encourage candidates to focus on rote learning rather than demonstrating innovative solutions.
These assessment tools may not account for the specific context or requirements of the hiring company’s projects.
The risk of candidates using unfair means to complete coding challenges, such as seeking external help or using unauthorized resources. However, some of them do come with integrations that help avoid these scenarios.
These platforms primarily focus on technical skills, often overlooking cultural fit and alignment with company values.
These assessments typically evaluate individual performance, neglecting the assessment of teamwork and collaboration skills.
Keeping these assessments up-to-date with the latest technologies and industry practices is an ongoing challenge.
Feedback post assessment might not align with what recruiters need to fetch for the respective departments of an organization.
These platforms can also be expensive for the volume of tech applicants, adding to the cost per hire. For HR and recruitment teams, the high cost can be a significant burden, especially if the tools don't lead to better hiring outcomes.
AI Recruitment Tools for Technical Skill Assessment
Before diving into technical skill assessments, using AI recruitment tools for initial screening is crucial. Here’s why:
Handling High Volume:
The sheer number of applications can be overwhelming. Imagine being buried under a mountain of resumes – it's not pretty. AI tools swiftly sift through applications, filtering out unqualified candidates like a sieve catching the big rocks.
Reducing Bias:
Human recruiters, bless their hearts, can be biased. Whether it’s a subconscious preference for certain universities or an aversion to unconventional career paths, bias creeps in. AI doesn’t care if you’re from Harvard or Hogwarts. It evaluates candidates based on predefined criteria, promoting a fairer selection process.
Identifying Key Competencies:
Finding candidates with the right mix of skills is like hunting for a needle in a haystack – if the haystack were on fire. AI tools analyze resumes for relevant experience, skills, and qualifications, ensuring only the best needles get through.
Tracking Generative AI Tricks:
With candidates using AI to polish their resumes, it’s easy to be fooled by what looks good on paper but might be a disaster in reality. AI tools can detect patterns and inconsistencies indicative of generative AI tampering, helping to ensure you’re assessing the real deal.
Filtering the First Round of Candidates:
Your time is precious. Wading through unqualified candidates wastes it. AI tools efficiently filter out the duds, leaving you with a pool of promising candidates who deserve a closer look.
Reducing Cost and Time per Hire:
Hiring is expensive and time-consuming. Nobody likes watching money and time swirl down the drain. AI streamlines the initial screening process, cutting down on the time and cost associated with each technical hiring.
Reducing the Cost of Simulative Software:
Advanced coding assessments and simulations aren’t cheap. Using them on every applicant is like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. AI pre-screens candidates, reducing the number who move on to costly simulations, saving resources and ensuring the software is used effectively.
Addressing Objections
Bias in AI:
AI might perpetuate existing biases from its training data. However, continuous monitoring and updating of AI algorithms can minimize bias. Plus, a well-tuned AI is often less biased than a human who hasn’t had their coffee yet.
Loss of Human Touch:
AI lacks the human touch necessary for nuanced judgment. But AI is here to assist, not replace. It handles the grunt work, allowing human recruiters to focus on the nuanced, personal aspects of hiring.
Over-Reliance on Automation:
Relying too much on AI might reduce critical human oversight. Think of AI as your overachieving assistant. It does the heavy lifting, but you still make the final call in tech hiring. Use AI to filter and inform, not dictate.
Using AI recruitment tools for initial screening before diving into tech interview questions makes perfect sense. It handles the heavy lifting of processing high volumes of applications, reduces bias, identifies key competencies, and saves time and money.
Impact of AI on Technical Skill Assessment
AI in recruitment is like having a superhero sidekick for technical hiring: it does the heavy lifting, making the hero (that’s you, dear recruiter) look even better. By using AI tools for the initial screening, you can swiftly and fairly filter through the avalanche of applications. This means you only have to focus on the diamonds in the rough.
Next, let those filtered candidates prove their worth with advanced simulations and coding challenges. This ensures they're not just good on paper but can actually walk the walk. And when it comes to the final decision, nothing beats the seasoned judgement of recruiters, HR professionals, and senior technical staff.
Combining AI's efficiency with human intuition creates a recruitment process that's not just effective but also fair and nuanced. So, think of AI as your trusty assistant: handling the grunt work, while you, the real star, make the final call. This synergy guarantees that you get the best hires without losing your sanity or blowing your budget. In the end, it’s a match made in recruitment heaven.
Join our newsletter list
We are working on some amazing stuff! Know it first when we launch new features!